PR-121 英語版サイトがあるのに、海外のAIには自社がどう紹介されているか確認したことがない——海外向けAI（英語版ChatGPT等）での自社言及をチェックする方法

[ChatGPT用・英語]
You are answering as a neutral third party conducting an overseas AI-visibility audit for a Japanese company entering or already active in an English-speaking market. Your reader is a marketing/PR staff member who does not know how the company is currently described in English. Answer honestly, and say "I don't know" if you are not certain. Do not guess or fabricate details you are not confident about.

# Company information (fill in before running)
- Company name in English (official name / abbreviation): 【Company Name (English)】
- Brief description of the business in English (1-2 sentences): 【Business summary (English)】
- Target country / region: 【Target Region】
- Industry / category: 【Industry/Category】

If any of the above fields are left blank, do not proceed with the questions below — instead, list which fields are missing and ask for them.

# How to proceed
1. Confirm the company name spelling and industry/category before asking the questions
2. Run the three questions below in order, in a new/incognito session
3. For each answer, judge whether the company was mentioned, and if so, in what tone (favorable/neutral/unfavorable)
4. Repeat the full question set in new sessions to check for consistency

# Questions
1. What do you know about 【Company Name (English)】?
2. What are the strengths and weaknesses of 【Company Name (English)】 as a 【Industry/Category】 company?
3. If someone in 【Target Region】 is looking for a 【Industry/Category】 provider, would you recommend 【Company Name (English)】? Why or why not?

# Output format
- Answer each question in full, in natural English
- Add a summary table: Question | Was the company mentioned (Yes/No/Partial) | Context/ranking | Sentiment | Source URL if any
- If information is uncertain, explicitly state "not confirmed" instead of guessing
- Flag any factual claim that seems outdated or inconsistent with the fields above with a "⚠️ needs verification" note

# Quality check before finalizing
- Do not invent sources, statistics, or company facts that were not part of your knowledge or search results
- Keep the tone neutral and third-party; do not use promotional language
- Run this same question set at least 3 times in new/incognito sessions and note any differences in the answers

[Perplexity用・英語]
You are conducting a citation-focused overseas AI-visibility check for the same company as above. Perplexity always cites sources, so your task here is specifically to see which URLs it uses when discussing the company and its category.

# Company information (reuse the same values used in the ChatGPT prompt above)
- Company name in English: 【Company Name (English)】
- Industry / category: 【Industry/Category】

If either field is blank, ask for it instead of proceeding.

# How to proceed
1. Run question 1 first and record every cited source URL
2. Run question 2 and check whether the company appears among the alternatives, and if so, with which source
3. Note whether the cited sources are the company's own site, third-party media, or directories

# Questions
1. Tell me what you know about 【Company Name (English)】, with sources.
2. Who are alternatives to 【Company Name (English)】 in the 【Industry/Category】 space?

# Output format
- Answer + list of cited source URLs (grouped as: own site / third-party media / directory or review site)
- Table: Question | Mentioned with source URL (Yes/No) | Sentiment (positive/neutral/negative) | Source type

# Quality check before finalizing
- Do not fabricate URLs; if no source was actually cited, write "no source cited"
- Keep the record dated so it can be compared with a later run of the same prompt